TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Oklahoma v. Texas

Oklahoma v. Texas, 269 U.S. 314 (1926)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 4, 1926
Docket
No. 13
Citations
269 U.S. 31446 S. Ct. 16470 L. Ed. 2851926 U.S. LEXIS 350

Opinion

On consideration of the third report of the Commissioners, heretofore selected to run, locate and mark portions of the boundary between the States of Texas and Oklahoma along the south bank of the Red River, showing that they have run, located and marked particular portions of such boundary from the One Hundredth meridian of longitude to the eastern limit of Lamar Cflunty, Texas, other than the Big Bend and Fort Augur areas covered by two reports heretofore presented and confirmed, which said third report was presented and filed herein November 16, 1925;

And no objection or. exception to such report being presented, although the time therefor has expired;

It' is now adjudged, ordered and decreed that the said report be in all respects confirmed.

It is further adjudged, ordered and decreed that the boundary line delineated and set forth in the report and *315 on the maps accompanying the same and referred to therein be established and declared to be the true boundary between the States of-Texas and Oklahoma along the Red River at the several places designated in such report, subject, however, to such changes as may hereafter be wrought by the natural and gradual processes known as erosion and accretion as specified in the second, third and fourth paragraphs of the decree rendered herein March 12, 1923, 261 U. S. 340 .

It is further ordered that the clerk of this Court do transmit to the Chief Magistrates of the States of Texas and Oklahoma copies of this decree, duly authenticated under the seal of this Court together with copies of the said report and of the maps accompanying the same.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1936: 11976: 219362026peak 1976 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Fred A. Chapman, Jr. And William C. Chapman v. Norman Moser and Wife, Laura Allen Moser532 F.2d 426 (5th Cir. 1976)
  2. Chapman v. Moser532 F.2d 425 (5th Cir. 1976)
  3. Sharp v. Womack93 S.W.2d 712 (Tex. 1936)

Most recent

  1. Fred A. Chapman, Jr. And William C. Chapman v. Norman Moser and Wife, Laura Allen Moser532 F.2d 426 (5th Cir. 1976)
  2. Chapman v. Moser532 F.2d 425 (5th Cir. 1976)
  3. Sharp v. Womack93 S.W.2d 712 (Tex. 1936)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Oklahoma v. State of Tex.. United States, Intervener, 261 U.S. 340 (1923) 31

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list