TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Banshee v. Gunn

Mansa Musa BANSHEE, Formerly Known as Stanley Rembert Butler, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William E. GUNN; Charles M. Condon, Respondents-Appellees

Banshee v. Gunn, 35 F. App'x 370 (4th Cir. 2002)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 28, 2002
Docket
No. 02-6414
Judges
Niemeyer, Michael, Motz
Citations
35 F. App'x 370
Status
Unpublished
Disposition
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Mansa Musa Banshee appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). The district court granted Banshee’s motion for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

See Banshee v. Gunn, No. CA-01-2349-6-10 (D.S.C. Feb. 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list