Phillips v. Johnson
Larry D. PHILLIPS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendant-Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Larry D. Phillips seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court dismisses a § 2254 petition solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’”
Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 , 120 S.Ct. 1595 , 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000)), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 941 , 122 S.Ct. 318 , 151 L.Ed.2d 237 (2001).
We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Phillips has not made the requisite showing.
See Phillips v. Johnson, No. CA-01-700-2 (E.D.Va. Dec. 5, 2002). Ac *184 cordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.