TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gallardo v. Santini Fertilizer Co.

Gallardo v. Santini Fertilizer Company

Gallardo v. Santini Fertilizer Co., 275 U.S. 62 (1927)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 31, 1927
Docket
No. 164
Judges
Holmes
Citations
275 U.S. 6248 S. Ct. 2472 L. Ed. 1571927 U.S. LEXIS 252

Opinion — Holmes

Mr. Justice Holmes delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a bill in equity brought in the District Court of Porto Rico to restrain the collection of taxes imposed by the laws of Porto Rico. An injunction was issued by the District Court, on March. 31, 1925. On April 7, 1925, an appeal was allowed to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. That Court at first made a decree 'reversing the,decree of the District Court, but later, on December 18, 1926, set that decree aside and transferred the case 'to this Court, under the Act of September 14,. 1922, c. 305; 42 Stat..837, conceiving that the jurisdiction of the District Court was' invoked solely upon the ground that the controversy involved the construction or application of the Constitution of the United States. On March 4, 1927, the Act of Congress was passed that took away the jurisdiction of the District Court in. this class óf cases, as explained in Smallwood v. Gallardo, ante, p. 56.

The case has been argued upon the merits and also upon a motion to remand -it to the Circuit Court of Appeals on the ground that the appeal properly was taken to that Court. As the only jurisdiction remaining anywhere is to make an order requiring the case to be dismissed for want of jurisdiction we need not discuss these *64 matters. The decision that no jurisdiction remains comes ■from this Court, and -it is proper that it'should carry out its decision without unnecessary circuity by directing it to be enforced.

Decree reversed.

Bill to ■ be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1946: 21947: 21948: 11963: 11976: 119462026peak 1946 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Kountze543 S.W.2d 871 (Tex. App. 1976)
  2. Very v. Whiteshield124 N.W.2d 694 (N.D. 1963)
  3. Fisch v. General Motors Corp.169 F.2d 266 (6th Cir. 1948)
  4. Suárez Martínez v. Tugwell67 P.R. Dec. 180 (1947)
  5. Hermanos v. Tribunal de Contribuciones de Puerto Rico66 P.R. Dec. 560 (1946)
  6. Hermanos v. Tax Court of Puerto Rico66 P.R. 531 (1946)

Most recent

  1. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Kountze543 S.W.2d 871 (Tex. App. 1976)
  2. Very v. Whiteshield124 N.W.2d 694 (N.D. 1963)
  3. Fisch v. General Motors Corp.169 F.2d 266 (6th Cir. 1948)
  4. Suárez Martínez v. Tugwell67 P.R. 166 (1947)
  5. Suárez Martínez v. Tugwell67 P.R. Dec. 180 (1947)
  6. Hermanos v. Tax Court of Puerto Rico66 P.R. 531 (1946)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list