TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

John L. Lewis v. Red Jacket Consolidated Coal & Coke

John L. Lewis, President of the United Mine Workers of America v. Red Jacket Consolidated Coal & Coke Company the International Organization of United Mine Workers of America v. Borderland Coal Corporation International Organization, United Mine Workers of America v. Alpha Pocahontas Coal Company International Organization, United Mine Workers of America v. Aetnae Sewell Smokeless Coal Company International Organization, United Mine Workers of America v. Dry Branch Coal Company International Organization, United Mine Workers of America v. Nelson Fuel Company International Organization, United Mine Workers of America v. Leevale Coal Company and Hopkins Fork Coal Company International Organization, United Mine Workers of America v. Seng Creek Coal Company and Mordue Collieries Company International Organization, United Mine Workers of America v. Raleigh-Wyoming Coal Company, Hazy Eagle Collieries Company International Organization, United Mine Workers of America v. Anchor Coal Company International Organization, United Mine Workers of America v. Sterling Block Coal Company International Organization, United Mine Workers of America v. Carbon Fuel Company

Lewis v. Red Jacket Consol. Coal & Coke, 275 U.S. 536 (1927)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 31, 1927
Docket
No. 325
Citations
275 U.S. 536

Opinion

275 U.S. 536 48 S.Ct. 31 72 L.Ed. 413

John L. LEWIS, President of the United Mine Workers of America et al., petitioners, v. RED JACKET CONSOLIDATED COAL & COKE COMPANY; The INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA et al., petitioners, v. BORDERLAND COAL CORPORATION et al.; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA et al., petitioners, v. ALPHA POCAHONTAS COAL COMPANY et al.; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA et al., petitioners, v. AETNAE SEWELL SMOKELESS COAL COMPANY et al.; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA et al., petitioners, v. DRY BRANCH COAL COMPANY et al.; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA et al., petitioners, v. NELSON FUEL COMPANY et al.; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA et al., petitioners, v. LEEVALE COAL COMPANY and Hopkins Fork Coal Company; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA et al., petitioners, v. SENG CREEK COAL COMPANY and Mordue Collieries Company; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA et al., petitioners, v. RALEIGH-WYOMING COAL COMPANY, Hazy Eagle Collieries Company et al.; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA et al., petitioners, v. ANCHOR COAL COMPANY et al.; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA et al., petitioners, v. STERLING BLOCK COAL COMPANY et al.; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA et al., petitioners, v. CARBON FUEL COMPANY et al.

No. 325.

No. 326.

No. 327.

No. 328.

No. 329.

No. 330.

No. 331.

No. 332.

No. 333.

No. 334.

No. 335.

No. 336.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 17, 1927

and

Messrs. Wm. A. Glasgow, Jr., of Philadelphia, Pa., Henry Warrum, of Indianapolis, Ind., and Thomas C. Townsend, of Charleston, W. Va., for petitioners.

Messrs. Edgar L. Greever, of Tazewell, Va., and Albert M. Belcher, and Robert S. Spilman, both of Charleston, W. Va. (Messrs. George S. Couch, of Charleston, W. Va., and Samuel L. Austin, of counsel), for respondents.

1

Petition for writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1941: 119412026peak 1941 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. B. Goedde & Co.40 F. Supp. 523 (E.D. Ill. 1941)

Most recent

  1. United States v. B. Goedde & Co.40 F. Supp. 523 (E.D. Ill. 1941)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list