TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas (United States, Intervener)

Oklahoma v. State of Tex. (United States, Intervener), 276 U.S. 596 (1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 5, 1928
Docket
Nos. 6, Original
Citations
276 U.S. 596

Opinion

276 U.S. 596 48 S.Ct. 297 72 L.Ed. 723

STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Complainant, v. STATE OF TEXAS (UNITED STATES, intervener).

No. 6, Original.

Decided March 5, 1928.

Mr. S. P. Freeling, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for the State of oklahoma.

Messrs. C. W. Taylor, of Corsicana, Tex., Orville Bullington and A. H. Carrigan, both of Wichita Falls, Tex., C. M. Cureton and W. A. Keeling, both of Austin, Tex., and T. W. Gregory and R. H. Ward, both of Houston, Tex., for the State of Texas.

PER CURIAM.

1

Upon consideration of the responses to the rule to show cause issued on January 9, 1928 ( 48 S. Ct. 205 , 72 L. Ed. —), it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that clause 1 of the decree entered in this cause on January 3, 1927 ( 273 U. S. 93 , 47 S. Ct. 307 , 71 L. Ed. 555 ), be and is changed so as to read as follows:

2

',1. The boundary between the state of Texas and the state of Oklahoma consituting the eastern boundary of the Panhandle of Texas and the main western boundary of Oklahoma, is the line of the true one-hundredth meridian of longitude west from Greenwich, extending north from its intersection with the south bank of the South fork of Red river to its intersection with the northern boundary line of the state of Texas as surveyed and marked upon the ground by John H. Clark, United States commissioner, under the Act of June 5, 1858, c. 92 ( 11 Stat. 310 ), or with a line running due east from the eastern terminus of the Clark survey if it is west of the meridian.' 3

The clerk is directed to transmit copies of this order to the Governors of Texas and Oklahoma, the Secretary of the Interior, and Samuel S. Gannett, commissioner, respectively.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1930: 21952: 119302026peak 1930 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations v. Seitz193 F.2d 456 (10th Cir. 1952)
  2. Oklahoma v. Texas281 U.S. 109 (1930)
  3. Oklahoma v. Texas281 U.S. 694 (1930)

Most recent

  1. Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations v. Seitz193 F.2d 456 (10th Cir. 1952)
  2. Oklahoma v. Texas281 U.S. 109 (1930)
  3. Oklahoma v. Texas281 U.S. 694 (1930)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Oklahoma v. Tex., United States, Intervener, 273 U.S. 93 (1927) 9
Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 275 U.S. 572 (1928) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list