TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

James A. Sackley Company v. The United States

James A. Sackley Co. v. The United States, 278 U.S. 609 (1928)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 8, 1928
Docket
No. 215
Citations
278 U.S. 60949 S. Ct. 1373 L. Ed. 5351928 U.S. LEXIS 473
Cited by 14 Original from court

Opinion

278 U.S. 609 49 S.Ct. 13 73 L.Ed. 535

JAMES A. SACKLEY COMPANY, petitioner, v. The UNITED STATES.

No. 215.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 8, 1928

Mr. Wm. M. Williams, of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

1

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Claims denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 14 cases

View all citing references →
1928: 21929: 21930: 11931: 11936: 11937: 11943: 11957: 21962: 11968: 11981: 119282026peak 1928 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. WOODMAR REALTY COMPANY v. McLEAN241 F.2d 768 (7th Cir. 1957)
  2. Woodmar Realty Co. v. McLean241 F.2d 768 (7th Cir. 1957)
  3. Van Dyk Research Corp. v. SCM Corp. (In re Van Dyk Research Corp.)13 B.R. 487 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1981)
  4. Hurley v. Wells-Newton Nat. Corporation49 F.2d 914 (D. Conn. 1931)
  5. Rice v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.42 F.2d 387 (6th Cir. 1930)
  6. Riddle v. United States38 F.2d 527 (Ct. Cl. 1929)

Most recent

  1. Van Dyk Research Corp. v. SCM Corp. (In re Van Dyk Research Corp.)13 B.R. 487 (Bankr. D.N.J. 1981)
  2. International Drilling Company v. M/V Doriefs291 F. Supp. 479 (S.D. Tex. 1968)
  3. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. v. Kinsey1962 OK 152, 372 P.2d 863
  4. WOODMAR REALTY COMPANY v. McLEAN241 F.2d 768 (7th Cir. 1957)
  5. Woodmar Realty Co. v. McLean241 F.2d 768 (7th Cir. 1957)
  6. Spreckles Sugar Co. v. South Atlantic S. S. Line49 F. Supp. 714 (S.D. Ga. 1943)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list