United States v. Malcolm
Opinion
282 U.S. 792 (1931)
UNITED STATES
v.
MALCOLM.
No. 512.
Supreme Court of United States.
Submitted January 12, 1931. Decided January 19, 1931. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
*794 Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Youngquist, Mr. Sewall Key and Miss Helen R. Carloss, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, and Mr. Erwin N. Griswold submitted for the United States.
Messrs. Kingman Brewster, James S.Y. Ivins, Allen G. Wright, A.J. Hill, O.R. Folsom-Jones, Joseph D. Brady, and F.E. Youngman submitted for Malcolm.
PER CURIAM.
The first question certified is answered: No. The second question is answered: Yes. Poe v. Seaborn, ante, p. 101; Goodell v. Koch, ante, p. 118; Hopkins v. Bacon, ante, p. 122.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 129 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court4
- U.S. Courts of Appeals29
- Federal District Courts9
- Federal Specialty Courts73
- State Highest Courts6
- State Appellate Courts3
- Territorial Courts5
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.