Farbwerke v. Chemical Foundation
Farbwerke Vormals Meister Lucius & Bruning, Etc. v. Chemical Foundation, Inc. Farbwerke Vormals Meister Lucius & Bruning v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. Deutsche Gold & Silber Scheide Anstalt Vormals Roessler v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. Badische-Anilin & Soda-Fabrik v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. Walter O. Woods, as Treasurer, Etc. v. The Chemical Foundation, Inc. Howard Sutherland, as Alien Property Custodian v. Farbwerke Vormals Meister Lucius & Bruning Howard Sutherland, as Alien Property Custodian v. Deutsche Gold & Silber Scheide Anstalt Vormals Roessler and Howard Sutherland, as Alien Property Custodian v. Badische Anilin & Soda-Fabrik
Opinion
282 U.S. 819 51 S.Ct. 25 75 L.Ed. 732
FARBWERKE vormals MEISTER LUCIUS & BRUNING et al., etc., petitioners, v. CHEMICAL FOUNDATION, Inc., et al. FARBWERKE vormals MEISTER LUCIUS & BRUNING, petitioner, v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO. et al. DEUTSCHE GOLD & SILBER SCHEIDE ANSTALT vormals ROESSLER, petitioner, v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO. et al. BADISCHE-ANILIN & SODA-FABRIK, petitioner, v. E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS & CO. et al. Walter O. WOODS, as Treasurer, etc., petitioner, v. The CHEMICAL FOUNDATION, Inc., et al. Howard SUTHERLAND, as Alien Property Custodian, petitioner, v. FARBWERKE vormals MEISTER LUCIUS & BRUNING et al. Howard SUTHERLAND, as Alien Property Custodian, petitioner, v. DEUTSCHE GOLD & SILBER SCHEIDE ANSTALT vormals ROESSLER et al. and Howard SUTHERLAND, as Alien Property Custodian, petitioner, v. BADISCHE ANILIN & SODA-FABRIK et al.
No. 179.
No. 180.
No. 181.
No. 182.
No. 271.
No. 272.
No. 273.
No. 274.
October 13, 1930
Messrs. Frederick H. Wood and Almuth C. Vandiver, both of New York City, for petitioners Farbwerke vormals and others.
The Attorney General, for petitioners Woods and Sutherland.
Mr. G. Carroll Todd, of Washington, D. C., for respondents.
1
Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granted.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.