TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fleisher v. United States

HARRY FLEISHER Et Al. v. UNITED STATES

Fleisher v. United States, 302 U.S. 218 (1937)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
December 6, 1937
Docket
No. 202—203
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
302 U.S. 21858 S. Ct. 14882 L. Ed. 20819 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 12241937 U.S. LEXIS 538

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

Judgments of conviction on four counts of an indictment charging conspiracies to violate provisions of the internal revenue laws were affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 91 F. (2d) 404. Certiorari was granted, limited to the question whether the first count of the indictment states an offense under federal law.

The first count alleged that defendants from October 1, 1934, to the date of the indictment, October 30, 1935, unlawfully conspired to possess, and cause to be possessed, stills and apparatus for the production of distilled spirits without having the same registered with the Collector of Internal Revenue as required by law. The Government concedes that under the applicable law the charge should have been that there was failure to register the stills with the District Supervisor of the Alcohol Tax Unit in the Bureau of Internal Revenue. The first count failed to state an offense. Act of March 3, 1927, c. 348, 44 Stat. 1381 ; 5 U. S. C. 281 c; Prohibition Reorganization Act of May 27, 1930, c. 342, 46 Stat. 427 ; Regulations No. 3, Bureau of Industrial Alcohol, Treasury Department (March 24, 1931), Article 14; Act of March 3, 1933, c. 212, § 16, 47 Stat. 1518 ; Executive Order No. 6639, March 10, 1934, 5 U. S. C. 132 note; Treasury Decision No. 4432, May 10, 1934.

Scott v. United States, 78 F. (2d) 791;

Benton v. United States, 80 F. (2d) 162.

The sentence upon count two provides that it shall run “from and after expiration of term of imprisonment im *220 posed on count one.” Each of the sentences on the remaining counts runs from the expiration of the term of imprisonment imposed on the preceding count. In view of the invalidity of the sentence on count one, the sentences on the remaining counts should be amended so as to fix a definite date for their commencement.

The judgments on count one are severally reversed and the causes are remanded for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.

Reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 16 cases

View all citing references →
1938: 41939: 11944: 11945: 11946: 11955: 11961: 11965: 21984: 11988: 11993: 12001: 119382026peak 1938 · 4

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list