TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Pfaff v. Commissioner

PFAFF Et Al., EXECUTORS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Pfaff v. Comm'r, 312 U.S. 646 (1941)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 31, 1941
Docket
No. 479
Judges
Reed
Citations
312 U.S. 64661 S. Ct. 78385 L. Ed. 109925 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 12191941 U.S. LEXIS 1253

Opinion — Reed

Mr. Justice Reed delivered the opinion of the. Court.

This case presents the same question as Helvering v. Estate of Enright, ante, p. 636. Petitioners are the executors of a deceased physician who during 1935 was a member of a medical partnership and entitled to forty per cent of its profits. He died December 25, 1935, on which date there were outstanding about $69,000 of partnership accounts receivable for services rendered to patients during his lifetime. His death worked a dissolution of the partnership under § 62(4) of the New York Partnership Law. The decedent’s interest in these ac *647 counts came to over $27,000. Both he and the partnership were on a cash basis. Pursuant to § 42 of the Revenue Act of 1934 and article 42(1) of Treasury Regulations 86, the commissioner included the decedent’s share of the accounts receivable in his 1935 income, though only at about one-fifth of face value. The Board of Tax Appeals sustained the commissioner’s view of the statute, and also ruled that the valuation of the decedent’s interest in the accounts at one-fifth of face value was amply supported. The Circuit Court of Appeals, without writing an opinion, affirmed the Board. 113 F. 2d 114 . Because of a conflict with the Third Circuit’s decision in the Enright case, supra, we granted certiorari.

There is no relevant difference between these facts and Helvering v. Estate of Enright.

For the reasons stated in that opinion it was proper to include in the decedent’s 1935 income the fair value of his interest in the accounts.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1941: 11942: 11945: 11951: 11968: 11970: 11975: 11986: 119412026peak 1941 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Estate of Rose348 A.2d 113 (Pa. 1975)
  2. Catherine K. Poorbaugh v. United States423 F.2d 157 (3d Cir. 1970)
  3. Peyton v. Rowe391 U.S. 54 (1968)
  4. Helvering v. McGlue's Estate119 F.2d 167 (4th Cir. 1941)
  5. Estate of Huesman v. Commissioner16 T.C. 656 (Tax Ct. 1951)
  6. Earle v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.167 S.W.2d 15 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1942)

Most recent

  1. Apkin v. Commissioner86 T.C. No. 44
  2. Estate of Rose348 A.2d 113 (Pa. 1975)
  3. Catherine K. Poorbaugh v. United States423 F.2d 157 (3d Cir. 1970)
  4. Peyton v. Rowe391 U.S. 54 (1968)
  5. Estate of Huesman v. Commissioner16 T.C. 656 (Tax Ct. 1951)
  6. Henderson v. Commissioner4 T.C. 1001 (Tax Ct. 1945)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list