Pfaff v. Commissioner
PFAFF Et Al., EXECUTORS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Opinion
Mr. Justice Reed delivered the opinion of the. Court.
This case presents the same question as Helvering v. Estate of Enright, ante, p. 636. Petitioners are the executors of a deceased physician who during 1935 was a member of a medical partnership and entitled to forty per cent of its profits. He died December 25, 1935, on which date there were outstanding about $69,000 of partnership accounts receivable for services rendered to patients during his lifetime. His death worked a dissolution of the partnership under § 62(4) of the New York Partnership Law. The decedent’s interest in these ac *647 counts came to over $27,000. Both he and the partnership were on a cash basis. Pursuant to § 42 of the Revenue Act of 1934 and article 42(1) of Treasury Regulations 86, the commissioner included the decedent’s share of the accounts receivable in his 1935 income, though only at about one-fifth of face value. The Board of Tax Appeals sustained the commissioner’s view of the statute, and also ruled that the valuation of the decedent’s interest in the accounts at one-fifth of face value was amply supported. The Circuit Court of Appeals, without writing an opinion, affirmed the Board. 113 F. 2d 114 . Because of a conflict with the Third Circuit’s decision in the Enright case, supra, we granted certiorari.
There is no relevant difference between these facts and Helvering v. Estate of Enright.
For the reasons stated in that opinion it was proper to include in the decedent’s 1935 income the fair value of his interest in the accounts.
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court1
- U.S. Courts of Appeals2
- Federal Specialty Courts3
- State Highest Courts1
- State Appellate Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.