TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

American Seating Company v. Lucian T. Zell

Am. Seating Co. v. Zell, 322 U.S. 709 (1944)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 8, 1944
Docket
No. 613
Citations
322 U.S. 70964 S. Ct. 105388 L. Ed. 15521944 U.S. LEXIS 1210

Opinion

322 U.S. 709 64 S.Ct. 1053 88 L.Ed. 1552

AMERICAN SEATING COMPANY, petitioner, v. Lucian T. ZELL.

No. 613.

Supreme Court of the United States

May 8, 1944

Messrs. Wm. Dwight Whitney and Albert R. Connelly, both of New York City (Mr. John Logan O'Donnell, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for petitioner.

Messrs. J. Edward Lumbard, Jr. and Theodore S. Hope, Jr., both of New York City (Messrs. Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Lumbard, and Ralstone R. Irvine, all of New York City, and Charles W. Sellers, of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for respondent.

On writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

1

In this case two members of the Court think that the judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals should be affirmed. Seven are of opinion that the judgment should be reversed and the judgment of the District Court affirmed—four because proof of the contract alleged in respondent's affidavits on the motion for summary judgment is precluded by the applicable state parol evidence rule, and three because the contract is contrary to public policy and void, see Tool Company v. Norris, 2 Wall. 45, 54 , 17 L.Ed. 868 ; Hazelton v. Sheckells, 202 U.S. 71, 79 , 26 S.Ct. 567, 568 , 50 L.Ed. 939 , 6 Ann.Cas. 217; Executive Order No. 9001, Tit. II, par. 5, 6 Fed.Reg. 6788, 50 U.S.C.A. Appendix § 611 note; War Department Procurement Regulations, 10 Code Fed.Reg. (Cum.Supp.) sec. 81.1181. The judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals is reversed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1945: 11946: 11949: 11951: 11955: 11975: 21988: 119452026peak 1975 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Hazelton v. Sheckells, 202 U.S. 71 (1906) 101
Tool Co. v. Norris, 69 U.S. (2 Wall.) 45 (1865) 158
Patterson v. Sanford, 322 U.S. 708 (1944) 22

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list