Federal Trade Commission v. Carter Products, Inc.
Opinion
Per Curiam.
Certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated.' The cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions to reinstate its prior judgment and order after amending it so that it specifically authorizes the Federal Trade Commission to open this proceeding for further evidence and a new order consistent with the Court of Appeals opinion herein. Cf.
Reilly v. Pinkus, 338 U. S. 269, 277; Labor Board v. Donnelly Garment Co., 330 U. S. 219, 224-228 .
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
- Caisson Corporation v. Ingersoll-Rand Company
- Pennsylvania State Athletic Commission v. Bratton
- Richard A. Williams and Alfred S. Trask v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc. . Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia, Leonard N
- Floyd v. Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy
- Carter Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
Most recent
- Poole v. Unemployment Appeals Commission
- Caisson Corporation v. Ingersoll-Rand Company
- Generella v. Weinberger
- Floyd v. Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy
- Richard A. Williams and Alfred S. Trask v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, D.C. Transit System, Inc. . Democratic Central Committee of the District of Columbia, Leonard N
- Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.