TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Bartkus v. Illinois

Bartkus v. Illinois, 355 U.S. 281 (1958)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 26, 1958
Docket
No. 39
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
355 U.S. 28178 S. Ct. 3362 L. Ed. 2d 2701958 U.S. LEXIS 1681

Opinion — Per Curiam

355 U.S. 281 (1958)

BARTKUS

v.

ILLINOIS.

No. 39.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued November 19, 1957. Decided January 6, 1958. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.

Walter T. Fisher, acting under appointment by the Court, 352 U. S. 958 , argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.

William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Latham Castle, Attorney General, and Theodore G. Maheras, Assistant Attorney General.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1959: 12015: 119592026peak 1959 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. James Alva Hoyland264 F.2d 346 (7th Cir. 1959)
  2. New Richmond News v. City of New Richmond2015 WI 106, 875 N.W.2d 107

Most recent

  1. New Richmond News v. City of New Richmond2015 WI 106, 875 N.W.2d 107
  2. United States v. James Alva Hoyland264 F.2d 346 (7th Cir. 1959)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Bartkus v. Illinois, 355 U.S. 281 (1958) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list