TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Dave Diamond

United States v. Dave Diamond, Also Known as David Dumanus, David Thornson, and Abe Slater, and Freeda, Diamond, Also Known as Frieda Diamond and Florence Slater

United States v. Diamond, 356 U.S. 257 (1958)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
April 7, 1958
Docket
No. 771
Citations
356 U.S. 25778 S. Ct. 7152 L. Ed. 2d 7571958 U.S. LEXIS 1265

Opinion

356 U.S. 257 78 S.Ct. 715 2 L.Ed.2d 757

UNITED STATES of America, petitioner, v. Dave DIAMOND, also known as David Dumanus, David Thornson, and Abe Slater, and Freeda, Diamond, also known as Frieda Diamond and Florence Slater.

No. 771.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 7, 1958

Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General McLean, Beatrice Rosenberg and Mr. J. F. Bishop, for the United States.

Mr. Robert L. Brock, for respondent David Diamond.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

PER CURIAM.

1

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1959: 11960: 11962: 11963: 11965: 11972: 11976: 219592026peak 1976 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Sydney B. Kadwell v. United States315 F.2d 667 (9th Cir. 1963)
  2. John A. Gearhart v. United States272 F.2d 499 (D.C. Cir. 1959)
  3. Raymond Miranda v. United States458 F.2d 1179 (2d Cir. 1972)
  4. Sullivan v. United States205 F. Supp. 545 (S.D.N.Y. 1962)
  5. Cort v. Herter187 F. Supp. 683 (D.D.C. 1960)
  6. United States v. LaVallee422 F. Supp. 1042 (S.D.N.Y. 1976)

Most recent

  1. M. J. Krutsinger v. Mead Foods, Inc.546 F.2d 328 (10th Cir. 1976)
  2. United States v. LaVallee422 F. Supp. 1042 (S.D.N.Y. 1976)
  3. Raymond Miranda v. United States458 F.2d 1179 (2d Cir. 1972)
  4. United States v. Washington341 F.2d 277 (3d Cir. 1965)
  5. Sydney B. Kadwell v. United States315 F.2d 667 (9th Cir. 1963)
  6. Sullivan v. United States205 F. Supp. 545 (S.D.N.Y. 1962)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list