TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States ex rel. Poret v. Sigler

UNITED STATES Ex Rel. PORET Et Al. v. SIGLER, WARDEN

United States ex rel. Poret v. Sigler, 361 U.S. 375 (1960)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 25, 1960
Docket
Nos. 307, Misc
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
361 U.S. 37580 S. Ct. 4044 L. Ed. 2d 3801960 U.S. LEXIS 1719
Cited by 6

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court for disposition of the question whether members of petitioners’ race were deliberately and intentionally limited and excluded in the selection of petit jury panels, in violation of the Federal Constitution.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →
1964: 11966: 11968: 21972: 11975: 119642026peak 1968 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Edgar Labat and Clifton Alton Poret v. Robert B. Bennett, Acting Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary365 F.2d 698 (5th Cir. 1966)
  2. Adderly v. Wainwright58 F.R.D. 389 (M.D. Fla. 1972)
  3. United States ex rel. Poret v. Sigler234 F. Supp. 171 (E.D. La. 1964)
  4. United States ex rel. Lois Sero v. Peter Preiser506 F.2d 1115 (2d Cir. 1975)
  5. In re Santiago248 A.2d 701 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1968)
  6. In re Petition of Carlos Santiago248 A.2d 701 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1968)

Most recent

  1. United States ex rel. Lois Sero v. Peter Preiser506 F.2d 1115 (2d Cir. 1975)
  2. Adderly v. Wainwright58 F.R.D. 389 (M.D. Fla. 1972)
  3. In re Petition of Carlos Santiago248 A.2d 701 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1968)
  4. In re Santiago248 A.2d 701 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1968)
  5. Edgar Labat and Clifton Alton Poret v. Robert B. Bennett, Acting Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary365 F.2d 698 (5th Cir. 1966)
  6. United States ex rel. Poret v. Sigler234 F. Supp. 171 (E.D. La. 1964)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list