PEKAO TRADING CORP. v. BRAGALINI
Pekao Trading Corp. v. George M. Bragalini
Opinion
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter would note probable jurisdiction and hear the case, the more so inasmuch as the transactions which New York has taxed concerned foreign commerce, unlike those which were involved in Northwestern States Portland Cement Co.
v. Minnesota, 358 U. S. 450 .
Mr. Justice Douglas is also of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.