TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. United States

WESTINGHOUSE BROADCASTING CO. v. UNITED STATES Et Al.

Westinghouse Broad. Co. v. United States, 364 U.S. 518 (1960)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
December 19, 1960
Docket
No. 484
Judges
Black, Douglas, Frankfurter
Citations
364 U.S. 51881 S. Ct. 2935 L. Ed. 2d 2641960 U.S. LEXIS 19731960 Trade Cas. (CCH) 69,874

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter is of the opinion that the motion to affirm should be granted.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 18 cases

View all citing references →
1965: 21967: 31968: 11970: 21971: 21972: 31975: 21976: 11979: 11980: 119652026peak 1967 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Blue Chip Stamp Company272 F. Supp. 432 (C.D. Cal. 1967)
  2. United States v. Aluminum Co. of America41 F.R.D. 342 (E.D. Mo. 1967)
  3. Sigety v. Abrams492 F. Supp. 1123 (S.D.N.Y. 1980)
  4. Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.386 U.S. 129 (1967)
  5. Kirstein v. Rector and Visitors of University of Virginia309 F. Supp. 184 (E.D. Va. 1970)
  6. Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corporation245 F. Supp. 258 (M.D. Penn. 1965)

Most recent

  1. Sigety v. Abrams492 F. Supp. 1123 (S.D.N.Y. 1980)
  2. Smith v. Lewis578 S.W.2d 169 (Tex. App. 1979)
  3. Brittian v. General Telephone Co. of Southwest533 S.W.2d 886 (Tex. App. 1976)
  4. Steele v. State537 P.2d 782 (Wash. 1975)
  5. Texas Woman's University v. Chayklintaste521 S.W.2d 949 (Tex. App. 1975)
  6. 4 Fair empl.prac.cas. 353, 4 Fair empl.prac.cas. 543, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7679, 4 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7864 Mary Ellen Schattman v. Texas Employment Commission459 F.2d 32 (5th Cir. 1972)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list