Bullock v. South Carolina

Bullock v. South Carolina, 365 U.S. 292 (1961)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: February 20, 1961
Docket: No. 78
Judges: Per Curiam
Citations: 365 U.S. 29281 S. Ct. 6865 L. Ed. 2d 5701961 U.S. LEXIS 1689

Cited by 6

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

After hearing oral argument and fully examining the record which was only partially set forth in the petition for certiorari, we conclude that the totality of circumstances as the record makes them manifest did not warrant bringing the case here. Accordingly, the writ is dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 6 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

Jackson v. Denno378 U.S. 368 (1964)
State v. Sharpe122 S.E.2d 622 (S.C. 1961)
Fay v. Noia372 U.S. 391 (1963)
State v. Jones259 S.E.2d 120 (S.C. 1979)
The STATE v. Worthy123 S.E.2d 835 (S.C. 1962)
Thornton v. Ohio365 U.S. 516 (1961)

Most recent

State v. Jones259 S.E.2d 120 (S.C. 1979)
Jackson v. Denno378 U.S. 368 (1964)
Fay v. Noia372 U.S. 391 (1963)
The STATE v. Worthy123 S.E.2d 835 (S.C. 1962)
State v. Sharpe122 S.E.2d 622 (S.C. 1961)
Thornton v. Ohio365 U.S. 516 (1961)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list