TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Managed Funds, Inc. v. Brouk

MANAGED FUNDS, INC., v. BROUK Et Al.

Managed Funds, Inc. v. Brouk, 369 U.S. 424 (1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
April 16, 1962
Docket
No. 87
Judges
Frankfurter, White
Citations
369 U.S. 42482 S. Ct. 8788 L. Ed. 2d 61962 U.S. LEXIS 2310

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

Upon the suggestion of mootness and the joint motion of counsel to vacate and remand, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the cause of action as to the respondents.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 20 cases

View all citing references →
1963: 41967: 31970: 11971: 11977: 11978: 11979: 11981: 11986: 11987: 21996: 11997: 11998: 219632026peak 1963 · 4

Most recent

  1. McLachlan v. Simon31 F. Supp. 2d 731 (N.D. Cal. 1998)
  2. Young v. Nationwide Life Insurance2 F. Supp. 2d 914 (S.D. Tex. 1998)
  3. Boland v. Engle113 F.3d 706 (7th Cir. 1997)
  4. King v. Douglass973 F. Supp. 707 (S.D. Tex. 1996)
  5. Bancroft Convertible Fund, Inc. v. Zico Investment Holdings Inc.825 F.2d 731 (1st Cir. 1987)
  6. Bancroft Convertible Fund, Inc. v. Zico Investment Holdings Inc.825 F.2d 731 (3d Cir. 1987)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list