TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hartman v. United States

Hartman v. United States, 370 U.S. 724 (1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
June 25, 1962
Docket
No. 447 M
Judges
Frankfurter, White, Clark, Russell
Citations
370 U.S. 72482 S. Ct. 15748 L. Ed. 2d 8011962 U.S. LEXIS 860

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the motion for leave to supplement the petition for certiorari and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed.

Russell v. United States, 369 U. S. 749 ;

Silber v. United States, ante, p. 717.

Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Russell v. United States, 369 U. S. 749, 779, 781 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Russell v. United States, 369 U.S. 749 (1962) 1,481

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list