TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Daegele v. Kansas

Daegele v. Kansas, 375 U.S. 1 (1963)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 14, 1963
Docket
No. 72 M
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
375 U.S. 184 S. Ct. 8911 L. Ed. 2d 441963 U.S. LEXIS 499
Cited by 19

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Kansas for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353 .

For reasons expressed in his dissenting opinion in No. 16, Misc., Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, post, p. 3, and related cases, Mr. Justice Harlan would set this case for argument of the question whether Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353 , should be applied retroactively.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 19 cases

View all citing references →
1964: 41965: 21966: 21969: 21970: 31971: 31981: 12007: 12017: 119642026peak 1964 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Donnell v. Swenson258 F. Supp. 317 (W.D. Mo. 1966)
  2. James v. Copinger441 F.2d 23 (4th Cir. 1971)
  3. Patrick Simmons v. Robert Kapture474 F.3d 869 (6th Cir. 2007)
  4. George William Daegele v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas429 F.2d 503 (10th Cir. 1970)
  5. Edward Frank Kanieski v. John R. Gagnon, Warden, Wisconsin Correctional Institution427 F.2d 401 (7th Cir. 1970)
  6. People ex rel. Mitchell v. Fay241 F. Supp. 165 (S.D.N.Y. 1965)

Most recent

  1. In re Care & Treatment of EmersonNo. 113503 (Kan. Apr. 7, 2017)
  2. Patrick Simmons v. Robert Kapture474 F.3d 869 (6th Cir. 2007)
  3. Archie W. Willeford v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Dept. Of Corrections637 F.2d 271 (5th Cir. 1981)
  4. Robert James v. Roger B441 F.2d 23 (4th Cir. 1971)
  5. James v. Copinger441 F.2d 23 (4th Cir. 1971)
  6. State v. Daegele479 P.2d 891 (Kan. 1971)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 (1963) 2,608

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list