TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Diamond v. Louisiana

Diamond v. Louisiana, 376 U.S. 201 (1964)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
February 24, 1964
Docket
No. 100
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
376 U.S. 20184 S. Ct. 69611 L. Ed. 2d 6501964 U.S. LEXIS 1730

Opinion — Per Curiam

376 U.S. 201 (1964)

DIAMOND

v.

LOUISIANA.

No. 100.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued February 20, 1964. Decided February 24, 1964. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.

James M. Nabrit III argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Wiley A. Branton and Johnnie A. Jones.

Ralph L. Roy argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1964: 12017: 119642026peak 1964 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Dale Huhmann v. Federal Express Corp.874 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2017)
  2. Commonwealth v. Millhouse34 Pa. D. & C.2d 693 (1964)

Most recent

  1. Dale Huhmann v. Federal Express Corp.874 F.3d 1102 (9th Cir. 2017)
  2. Commonwealth v. Millhouse34 Pa. D. & C.2d 693 (1964)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list