TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Fawcett Publications, Inc. v. Morris

Fawcett Publications, Inc., v. Morris

Fawcett Publications, Inc. v. Morris, 376 U.S. 513 (1964)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 4, 1964
Docket
No. 57
Judges
Black, Douglas
Citations
376 U.S. 513

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted or that the petition for writ of certiorari should be granted.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1964: 11966: 21973: 11976: 11984: 11993: 11997: 12005: 119642026peak 1966 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Floyd B. Burchett, Complainant- v. Bardahl Oil Company and Nance & Associates, Ltd.470 F.2d 793 (10th Cir. 1973)
  2. Peisner v. Detroit Free Press, Inc.242 N.W.2d 775 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976)
  3. McCullough v. Cities Service Co.676 P.2d 833 (Okla. 1984)
  4. Sovik v. Healing Network244 A.D.2d 985 (1997)
  5. Pratt v. Nelson2005 UT App 541, 127 P.3d 1256
  6. United Medical Laboratories, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.258 F. Supp. 735 (D. Or. 1966)

Most recent

  1. Pratt v. Nelson2005 UT App 541, 127 P.3d 1256
  2. Sovik v. Healing Network244 A.D.2d 985 (1997)
  3. Tatum v. Philip Morris Inc.16 F.3d 417 (10th Cir. 1993)
  4. McCullough v. Cities Service Co.676 P.2d 833 (Okla. 1984)
  5. Peisner v. Detroit Free Press, Inc.242 N.W.2d 775 (Mich. Ct. App. 1976)
  6. Floyd B. Burchett, Complainant- v. Bardahl Oil Company and Nance & Associates, Ltd.470 F.2d 793 (10th Cir. 1973)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list