State ex rel. Carter v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth.
Syllabus
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 496 .]
THE STATE EX REL. CARTER, APPELLANT, v. OHIO ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Carter v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 2000-Ohio-226 .] Judgment of court of appeals affirmed. (No. 99-2108—Submitted April 26, 2000—Decided August 30, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-235. __________________ Paul Mancino, Jr., for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Jihad M. Smaili, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellant had adequate legal remedies to raise his claims. Moreover, habeas corpus, not mandamus, is the proper action to seek release from prison. See State ex rel. Milner v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (2000), 87 Ohio St.3d 567, 568 , 722 N.E.2d 72 . Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.