TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lathan v. New York

Lathan v. New York, 378 U.S. 566 (1964)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
June 22, 1964
Docket
No. 298 M
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
378 U.S. 56684 S. Ct. 192312 L. Ed. 2d 10381964 U.S. LEXIS 853

Opinion — Per Curiam

378 U.S. 566 (1964)

LATHAN

v.

NEW YORK.

No. 298, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 22, 1964. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.

Murray A. Gordon for petitioner.

Isidore Dollinger and Bertram R. Gelfand for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals of the State of New York is vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in Jackson v. Denno, ante, p. 368.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent for the reasons stated in their dissenting opinions in Jackson v. Denno, supra .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1965: 11970: 11971: 119652026peak 1965 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list