TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Tralins v. Gerstein

Tralins v. Gerstein, State Attorney

Tralins v. Gerstein, 378 U.S. 576 (1964)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
June 22, 1964
Docket
No. 246
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
378 U.S. 57684 S. Ct. 190312 L. Ed. 2d 10331964 U.S. LEXIS 863
Cited by 17

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, and the judgment is reversed. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas would reverse for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Black in Jacobellis v. Ohio, ante, p. 196. Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Goldberg would reverse for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Brennan in Jacobellis, ante, p. 184. Mr. Justice Stewart would reverse for the reasons stated in his opinion in Jacobellis, ante, p. 197. The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Clark, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 17 cases

View all citing references →
1964: 31965: 61966: 21969: 11970: 31973: 11974: 119642026peak 1965 · 6

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Irving Klaw and Jack Kramer350 F.2d 155 (2d Cir. 1965)
  2. Grand Rapids City Attorney v. Bloss169 N.W.2d 367 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
  3. State v. Locks397 P.2d 949 (Ariz. 1964)
  4. Henry J. Haldeman v. United States340 F.2d 59 (10th Cir. 1965)
  5. People v. Billingsley173 N.W.2d 785 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)
  6. City of Chicago v. Geraci264 N.E.2d 153 (Ill. 1970)

Most recent

  1. Commonwealth v. Horton310 N.E.2d 316 (Mass. 1974)
  2. Kaplan v. California413 U.S. 115 (1973)
  3. City of Chicago v. Geraci264 N.E.2d 153 (Ill. 1970)
  4. Meyer v. Austin319 F. Supp. 457 (M.D. Fla. 1970)
  5. Grand Rapids City Attorney v. Bloss169 N.W.2d 367 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
  6. People v. Billingsley173 N.W.2d 785 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list