TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ruark v. Colorado

Ruark v. Colorado, 378 U.S. 585 (1964)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
June 22, 1964
Docket
No. 1173 M
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
378 U.S. 58584 S. Ct. 193512 L. Ed. 2d 10421964 U.S. LEXIS 874
Cited by 30

Opinion — Per Curiam

378 U.S. 585 (1964)

RUARK

v.

COLORADO.

No. 1173, Misc.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 22, 1964. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO.

Petitioner pro se.

Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and John E. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Colorado for consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, dissenting.

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Smith v. Crouse, ante, p. 584, I would set this case for argument.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 30 cases

View all citing references →
1965: 91966: 61967: 41968: 31970: 11971: 31976: 11978: 11982: 11986: 119652026peak 1965 · 9

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Cruz v. Patterson253 F. Supp. 805 (D. Colo. 1966)
  2. In re Lopez398 P.2d 380 (Cal. 1965)
  3. Sheilah C. Hicks v. United States382 F.2d 158 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  4. Donnell v. Swenson258 F. Supp. 317 (W.D. Mo. 1966)
  5. In re Mitchell437 P.2d 289 (Cal. 1968)
  6. Stanmore v. People401 P.2d 829 (Colo. 1965)

Most recent

  1. State v. Patrick345 S.E.2d 481 (S.C. 1986)
  2. United States v. Daniel P. Flemino691 F.2d 1263 (8th Cir. 1982)
  3. United States v. Carolyn Porter Fuel, United States of America v. Merle O. Greene, Jr. And Julia Greene583 F.2d 978 (8th Cir. 1978)
  4. United States v. Thomas Murphy Donahue539 F.2d 1131 (8th Cir. 1976)
  5. Williams v. Leeke184 S.E.2d 441 (S.C. 1971)
  6. United States v. Tuggles334 F. Supp. 383 (E.D. Pa. 1971)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Douglas v. California, 372 U.S. 353 (1963) 2,608

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list