Arrow Transportation Co. v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.
ARROW TRANSPORTATION CO. Et Al. v. CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS & TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. Et Al.
Opinion
*643 Per Curiam.
These appeals are from a single judgment of a three-judge District Court, 229 F. Supp. 572 , which set aside and permanently enjoined the operation, enforcement and execution of the order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, 321 I. C. C. 582, canceling certain rate reductions which had been put into effect by the appellee railroads on the grounds that the new lower rates violated §§ 1 (5) and 3 (1) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U. S. C. §§ 1 (5), 3 (1) (1958 ed.). The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court with instructions to enter an order'remanding the case to the Interstate Commerce Commission for reconsideration by the Commission in light of the District Court’s determinations (1) that the Commission’s conclusion <that § 3 (1) was violated was not supported by. adequate, findings and (2) that the Commission’s conclusion that § 1 (5) was violáted was based, at least in part, on its prior conclusion that there was a violation of i 3 (1). See FPC v. Idaho Power Co., 344 U. S. 17, 20 .
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White would note probable jurisdiction of these appeals and set them for argument on. the merits.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 13 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- National Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Accuracy in Media, Inc.
- Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. United States
- Central Power & Light Co. v. United States
- Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. v. United States
- United States v. Saskatchewan Minerals
- Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. v. United States
Most recent
- (1998)
- Central Power and Light Co. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, State of Texas v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission
- Central Power & Light Co. v. United States
- Houston Lighting & Power Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Burlington Northern, Inc.
- Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. United States
- Asg Industries, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, and the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co., Intervening
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.