TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Abernathy v. Alabama

Abernathy v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 447 (1965)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
April 5, 1965
Docket
No. 9
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
380 U.S. 44785 S. Ct. 110114 L. Ed. 2d 1511965 U.S. LEXIS 1485
Cited by 5 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion — Per Curiam

380 U.S. 447 (1965)

ABERNATHY ET AL.

v.

ALABAMA.

No. 9.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 12-13, 1964. Decided April 5, 1965. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF ALABAMA.

Louis H. Pollak argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III, Fred D. Gray and Charles S. Conley.

Leslie Hall, Assistant Attorney General of Alabama, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Richmond M. Flowers, Attorney General of Alabama.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments are reversed. Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U. S. 454 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 5 cases

View all citing references →
1966: 31970: 11999: 119662026peak 1966 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Callendar v. State184 So. 2d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)
  2. Hill v. Town of Conway193 F.3d 33 (1st Cir. 1999)
  3. Callendar v. State181 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 1966)
  4. Baines v. City of Birmingham238 So. 2d 352 (Ala. Crim. App. 1970)
  5. Callender v. Florida383 U.S. 270 (1966)

Most recent

  1. Hill v. Town of Conway193 F.3d 33 (1st Cir. 1999)
  2. Baines v. City of Birmingham238 So. 2d 352 (Ala. Crim. App. 1970)
  3. Callendar v. State184 So. 2d 656 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)
  4. Callender v. Florida383 U.S. 270 (1966)
  5. Callendar v. State181 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 1966)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Boynton v. Virginia, 364 U.S. 454 (1960) 76

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list