TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Harrison v. Schaefer

HARRISON Et Al. v. SCHAEFER Et Al.

Harrison v. Schaefer, 383 U.S. 269 (1966)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 7, 1966
Docket
No. 854
Judges
Fortas
Citations
383 U.S. 269
Cited by 20

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 20 cases

View all citing references →
1966: 21967: 21968: 11969: 21971: 11972: 41976: 11978: 11982: 31983: 11991: 11995: 119662026peak 1972 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Brown v. Thomson536 F. Supp. 780 (D. Wyo. 1982)
  2. Whitcomb v. Chavis403 U.S. 124 (1971)
  3. Buckley v. Valeo424 U.S. 1 (1976)
  4. Brown v. Thomson462 U.S. 835 (1983)
  5. Swann v. Adams385 U.S. 440 (1967)
  6. Sixty-Seventh Minnesota State Senate v. Beens406 U.S. 187 (1972)

Most recent

  1. Pueblo v. Ramos Santos138 P.R. Dec. 810 (1995)
  2. Gorin v. Karpan775 F. Supp. 1430 (D. Wyo. 1991)
  3. Brown v. Thomson462 U.S. 835 (1983)
  4. Kallenberger v. Buchanan649 P.2d 314 (Colo. 1982)
  5. Brown v. Thomson536 F. Supp. 780 (D. Wyo. 1982)
  6. In re Reapportionment of the Colorado General Assembly647 P.2d 191 (Colo. 1982)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list