Worthy v. United States

Worthy v. United States, 384 U.S. 894 (1966)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: June 20, 1966
Docket: Nos. 1107, Misc
Judges: Per Curiam
Citations: 384 U.S. 89486 S. Ct. 1961

Cited by 30 7 descriptions by later courts

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Dennis v. United States, ante, p. 855.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 7 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(spectators except press and the bar excluded to maintain order in the courtroom)

Nieto v. Sullivan, 879 F.2d 743 (10th Cir. 1989)
(“somewhat less than” 4-month delay does not require inquiry into reasonableness of police procedure)

Gordan v. United States, 271 F. Supp. 950 (D.D.C. 1967)
(to maintain order in the courtroom)

United States v. Sherlock, 962 F.2d 1349 (9th Cir. 1992)
(to protect witnesses from intimidation)

Douglas v. Wainwright, 714 F.2d 1532 (11th Cir. 1983)

Cited by 30 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

David M. Robinson v. United States459 F.2d 847 (D.C. Cir. 1972)
United States v. John Moore, Jr.554 F.2d 1086 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
United States v. Westmoreland41 F.R.D. 419 (S.D. Ind. 1967)
Oscar Dancy, Jr. v. United States395 F.2d 636 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
Jerome Worthy v. United States383 F.2d 524 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
United States v. Hughes388 F.2d 236 (5th Cir. 1968)

Most recent

State v. Cuccio794 A.2d 880 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2002)
Williams v. State736 So. 2d 699 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Cosentino v. Kelly102 F.3d 71 (2d Cir. 1996)
Cosentino v. Kelly926 F. Supp. 391 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)
United States v. Short41 M.J. 42 (1994)
Tonka Corp. v. Rose Art Industries, Inc.836 F. Supp. 200 (D.N.J. 1993)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list