Cady v. Missouri ex rel. State Highway Comm'n of Mo.

CADY Et Al. v. MISSOURI Ex Rel. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION OF MISSOURI

Cady v. Mo. ex rel. State Highway Comm'n of Mo., 385 U.S. 204 (1967)

Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Decided: February 20, 1967
Docket: No. 613
Judges: Per Curiam
Citations: 385 U.S. 204

Cited by 8 2 descriptions by later courts

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(evidence of an attempt to negotiate held sufficient to satisfy condemnor’s burden of acting in good faith)

State ex rel. Mo. Highway & Transp. Comm'n v. Anderson, 735 S.W.2d 350 (Mo. 1987)

Cited by 8 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

State ex rel. Weatherby Advertising Co. v. Conley527 S.W.2d 334 (Mo. 1975)
State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Anderson735 S.W.2d 350 (Mo. 1987)
State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Pinkley474 S.W.2d 46 (Mo. Ct. App. 1971)
State ex rel. County of Shannon v. Chilton626 S.W.2d 426 (Mo. Ct. App. 1981)
State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Nickerson578 S.W.2d 916 (Mo. 1979)
City of Columbia v. Baurichter713 S.W.2d 263 (Mo. 1986)

Most recent

State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Rantz43 S.W.3d 436 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
State ex rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Anderson735 S.W.2d 350 (Mo. 1987)
City of Columbia v. Baurichter713 S.W.2d 263 (Mo. 1986)
State ex rel. County of Shannon v. Chilton626 S.W.2d 426 (Mo. Ct. App. 1981)
State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. Nickerson578 S.W.2d 916 (Mo. 1979)
State ex rel. Weatherby Advertising Co. v. Conley527 S.W.2d 334 (Mo. 1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list