TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Ministers Life & Casualty Union v. Haase

MINISTERS LIFE & CASUALTY UNION v. HAASE, COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE, Et Al.

Ministers Life & Cas. Union v. Haase, 385 U.S. 205 (1966)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
December 12, 1966
Docket
No. 634
Judges
Harlan, Stewart, Fortas
Citations
385 U.S. 205
Cited by 16 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 16 cases

View all citing references →
1967: 11968: 11971: 11973: 11974: 11975: 11976: 11978: 11980: 31983: 11986: 11989: 11996: 12012: 119672026peak 1980 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Morgan v. Amex Assurance Co.287 P.3d 1038 (Or. 2012)
  2. People v. United National Life Insurance427 P.2d 199 (Cal. 1967)
  3. State v. Courtney247 N.W.2d 714 (Wis. 1976)
  4. State v. McHorse517 P.2d 75 (N.M. Ct. App. 1973)
  5. State v. Ehlenfeldt288 N.W.2d 786 (Wis. 1980)
  6. Nagel v. Crain Cutter Co.184 N.W.2d 876 (Wis. 1971)

Most recent

  1. Morgan v. Amex Assurance Co.287 P.3d 1038 (Or. 2012)
  2. Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services, Ltd. v. Clark676 A.2d 1357 (R.I. 1996)
  3. Conte & Co., Inc. v. Stephan713 F. Supp. 1382 (D. Kan. 1989)
  4. State v. Mann400 N.W.2d 489 (Wis. Ct. App. 1986)
  5. Illinois Commercial Men's Ass'n v. State Board of Equalization671 P.2d 349 (Cal. 1983)
  6. Armed Forces Cooperative Insuring Ass'n v. Department of Insurance622 P.2d 1318 (Wyo. 1980)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list