TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wackenhut Corp. v. Aponte

Wackenhut Corp. v. Aponte, 386 U.S. 268 (1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 13, 1967
Docket
No. 726
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
386 U.S. 26887 S. Ct. 1017
Cited by 9

Opinion — Per Curiam

386 U.S. 268 (1967)

WACKENHUT CORP. ET AL.

v.

APONTE, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ET AL.

No. 726.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 13, 1967. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO.

Donald M. Hall for Wackenhut Corp. et al., and William B. Graves for Marvil International Security Services, Inc., appellants.

J. B. Fernandez Badillo, Solicitor General of Puerto Rico, and Peter Ortiz, Assistant Solicitor General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 9 cases

View all citing references →
1972: 21974: 21977: 11978: 11988: 11994: 11997: 119722026peak 1972 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Jose Raul Pagan Torres, Etc. v. Pedro Negron Ramos, Etc.578 F.2d 11 (1st Cir. 1978)
  2. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.416 U.S. 663 (1974)
  3. Wackenhut Corp. v. Rodríguez Aponte100 P.R. Dec. 518 (1972)
  4. Ramírez de Ferrer v. Mari Brás144 P.R. Dec. 141 (1997)
  5. Asociación de Maestros v. Arsenio Torres137 P.R. Dec. 528 (1994)
  6. Pueblo v. Castro García120 P.R. Dec. 740 (1988)

Most recent

  1. Ramírez de Ferrer v. Mari Brás144 P.R. Dec. 141 (1997)
  2. Asociación de Maestros v. Arsenio Torres137 P.R. Dec. 528 (1994)
  3. Pueblo v. Castro García120 P.R. Dec. 740 (1988)
  4. Jose Raul Pagan Torres, Etc. v. Pedro Negron Ramos, Etc.578 F.2d 11 (1st Cir. 1978)
  5. Pueblo v. Torres Lozada106 P.R. Dec. 588 (1977) · Concurrence
  6. Oquendo v. Insurance Company of Puerto Rico388 F. Supp. 1030 (D.P.R. 1974)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list