TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Boyden v. California

Gerald Glen Boyden v. California

Boyden v. California, 386 U.S. 278 (1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 13, 1967
Docket
Nos. 57, Misc
Judges
Stewart, California
Citations
386 U.S. 27887 S. Ct. 103718 L. Ed. 2d 461967 U.S. LEXIS 2053
Summary
Mise.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The motion, for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, ante, p. 18.

Mr. Justice Stewart would vacaté the judgment and remand for reconsideration in light of the views stated in his opinion concurring-dn the result in Chapman v. California, ante, at 42.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1979: 219792026peak 1979 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Meinert594 P.2d 232 (Kan. 1979)
  2. State v. Randol597 P.2d 672 (Kan. 1979)

Most recent

  1. State v. Randol597 P.2d 672 (Kan. 1979)
  2. State v. Meinert594 P.2d 232 (Kan. 1979)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967) 19,172

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list