Oscar Gruss & Son v. United States
OSCAR GRUSS & SON v. UNITED STATES Et Al.
Opinion
Per Curiam.
Appellant is a bondholder of the New York, New Haven &.Hartford Railroad Company (the New Haven), which is now undergoing a reorganization under § 77 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U. S. C. § 205 . On April 6, 1966, the Interstate Commerce Commission directed inclusion of the New Haven in the merger of the New York Central Railroad Company and the Pennsylvania Railroad Company as soon as terms and conditions could be settled, but approved the Penn-Central merger and authorized its consummation prior to such inclusion. Appellant then petitioned the Commission to reconsider this order. The Commission allowed appellant to intervene but denied the petition to reconsider, and appellant then challenged the Commission’s order of April 6 in the District Court, *777 which dismissed the complaint on the ground, among others, that appellant lacked standing to attack the Penn-Central merger. Since that time this Court has reviewed other aspects of the Commission’s order approving the merger ¿nd has directed a remand to the Commission for further proceedings.
Baltimore & Ohio R. Co.
v. United States, ante, p. 372. Since the order which appellant’s suit attacked is now subject to further consideration by the Commission and since proceedings to achieve inclusion of the New.Haven are also under way before the Commission, it appears inappropriate to review the decision of the District Court at this time. Rather, we vacate the order of the. District Court and remand the case , to that court. Should appellant still be dissatisfied with the ultimate order of the Commission in the merger proceedings, it may attempt a fresh challenge in the District Court..
It is so ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 13 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. United States
- Erie-Lackawanna Railroad Company v. United States
- Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. United States
- In re the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, Debtor. The Chase Manhattan Bank (N. A.), as Trustee Under the Debtor's General Income Mortgage Dated July 1, 1947, the Committee for the Holders of the Debtor's First and Refunding Mortgage Bonds and Oscar Gruss & Son, Richard Joyce Smith and William J. Kirk, as the Trustees of the Debtor's Property
- In re New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
- United States v. 729.773 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Honolulu
Most recent
- United States v. 1,402 ACRES OF LAND
- United States v. 2.9 Acres of Land, More or Less, Etc.
- United States v. 729.773 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Honolulu
- United States v. 101.88 Acres of Land
- People v. Rico
- United States v. 58.16 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Clinton County, State of Illinois, and George Cooley, and Unknown Owners
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.