TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lester C. Newton Trucking Co. v. United States

LESTER C. NEWTON TRUCKING CO. v. UNITED STATES Et Al.

Lester C. Newton Trucking Co. v. United States, 389 U.S. 30 (1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 16, 1967
Docket
No. 328
Judges
Harlan, White, Marshall
Citations
389 U.S. 3088 S. Ct. 10819 L. Ed. 2d 291967 U.S. LEXIS 508
Cited by 16

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice White would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 16 cases

View all citing references →
1967: 11969: 21970: 11973: 11974: 41975: 11976: 21978: 11980: 21987: 119672026peak 1974 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Hughes v. United States278 F. Supp. 11 (E.D. Pa. 1967)
  2. Trans-American Van Service, Inc. v. United States421 F. Supp. 308 (N.D. Tex. 1976)
  3. Lemmon Transport Company v. United States393 F. Supp. 838 (W.D. Va. 1975)
  4. Tri-State Motor Transit Co. v. United States369 F. Supp. 1242 (W.D. Mo. 1973)
  5. Artus Trucking Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission377 F. Supp. 1224 (E.D.N.Y. 1974)
  6. Superior Trucking Co. v. United States306 F. Supp. 872 (N.D. Ga. 1969)

Most recent

  1. State v. Passante542 A.2d 952 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1987)
  2. Reid v. Exports, Inc.388 So. 2d 1332 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
  3. Goldstein v. Miller488 F. Supp. 156 (D. Maryland 1980)
  4. Division of Beverage, Department of Business Regulation v. Bonanni Ship Supply, Inc.356 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 1978)
  5. Trans-American Van Service, Inc. v. United States421 F. Supp. 308 (N.D. Tex. 1976)
  6. Hilt Truck Line, Inc. v. United States532 F.2d 1199 (8th Cir. 1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list