Potomac News Co. v. United States
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767 .
Concurrence
Mr. Justice Harlan
concurs in the judgment of reversal upon the premises stated in his separate opinion in. Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496 , and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455, 457 .
The Chief Justice dissents. Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Combined text as published — syllabus, headnotes and all opinions in one document
389 U.S. 47 (1967)
POTOMAC NEWS CO.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 164.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided October 23, 1967. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.
Stanley M. Dietz for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Jerome M. Feit for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767 .
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the judgment of reversal upon the premises stated in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496 , and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413, 455, 457 .
THE CHIEF JUSTICE dissents.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(purveyor intended to distribute the magazine among male homosexuals at a mark-up from twenty-four cents to five dollars a copy.)
Cited by 45 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court4
- U.S. Courts of Appeals12
- Federal District Courts9
- State Highest Courts11
- State Appellate Courts7
- State Specialty Courts2
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.