National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc. v. Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc.
Opinion
389 U.S. 576 (1968)
NATIONAL SMALL SHIPMENTS TRAFFIC CONFERENCE, INC., ET AL.
v.
RINGSBY TRUCK LINES, INC., ET AL.
No. 163.
Supreme Court of United States.
Decided January 15, 1968. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.
Arthur A. Arsham, John J. C. Martin and Max L. Wymore for appellants.
LeGrand Alf Carlston and Z. L. Pearson, Jr., for appellees.
Solicitor General Griswold, former Solicitor General Marshall and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed as moot.
MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.
MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States
- Pittsburgh & New England Trucking Co. v. United States
- Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc., ( Below) v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, (Defendantsbelow) v. The National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc., and Drug Andtoilet Preparation Traffic Conference, (Intervening Defendantsbelow)
Most recent
- Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc., ( Below) v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, (Defendantsbelow) v. The National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc., and Drug Andtoilet Preparation Traffic Conference, (Intervening Defendantsbelow)
- Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States
- Pittsburgh & New England Trucking Co. v. United States
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.