TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Arkansas v. Tennessee

State of Arkansas v. State of Tennessee

Arkansas v. Tennessee, 389 U.S. 1026 (1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 15, 1968
Docket
Nos. 33, Original
Citations
389 U.S. 102688 S. Ct. 75719 L. Ed. 2d 8151968 U.S. LEXIS 2736

Opinion

Motion for leave to file bill of complaint granted and the State of Tennessee allowed sixty days to answer.

It Is Ordered that the Honorable Gunnar H. Nordbye, Senior Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, be, and he is hereby, appointed Special Master in this case with authority to fix the time and conditions for the filing of additional pleadings and to direct subsequent proceedings, and with authority to summon witnesses, issue subpoenas, and take such evidence as may be introduced and such as he may deem it necessary to call for. The Master is directed to submit such reports as he may deem appropriate.

The Master shall be allowed his actual expenses. The allowances to him, the compensation paid to his technical, stenographic, and clerical assistants, the cost of printing his report, and all other proper expenses shall be charged against and be borne by the parties in such proportion as the Court hereafter may direct.

It Is Further Ordered that if the position of Special Master in this case becomes vacant during a recess of the Court, The Chief Justice shall have authority to make a new designation which shall have the same effect as if originally made by the Court herein.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1968: 11970: 11971: 11973: 11974: 11979: 11980: 11995: 119682026peak 1968 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Grant1995 OK 68, 901 P.2d 807
  2. Arkansas v. Tennessee397 U.S. 88 (1970)
  3. Sciolino v. Marine Midland Bank-Western463 F. Supp. 128 (W.D.N.Y. 1979)
  4. Common Cause v. Democratic National Committee333 F. Supp. 803 (D.D.C. 1971)
  5. Stirling v. Chemical Bank382 F. Supp. 1146 (S.D.N.Y. 1974)
  6. Nesglo, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.506 F. Supp. 254 (D.P.R. 1980)

Most recent

  1. Resolution Trust Corp. v. Grant1995 OK 68, 901 P.2d 807
  2. Nesglo, Inc. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.506 F. Supp. 254 (D.P.R. 1980)
  3. Sciolino v. Marine Midland Bank-Western463 F. Supp. 128 (W.D.N.Y. 1979)
  4. Stirling v. Chemical Bank382 F. Supp. 1146 (S.D.N.Y. 1974)
  5. International Railways of Central America v. United Brands Co.358 F. Supp. 1363 (S.D.N.Y. 1973)
  6. Common Cause v. Democratic National Committee333 F. Supp. 803 (D.D.C. 1971)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list