TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McSurely v. Ratliff

McSURELY Et Al. v. RATLIFF Et Al.

McSurely v. Ratliff, 390 U.S. 412 (1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 18, 1968
Docket
No. 1113
Judges
Black, Douglas
Citations
390 U.S. 41288 S. Ct. 111219 L. Ed. 2d 12721968 U.S. LEXIS 2173

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The stay heretofore granted, post, p. 914, is continued for 30 days in order to afford the appellants an opportunity to apply to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for a stay. If such timely application is made, the stay entered by this Court shall remain in effect until the Court of Appeals acts on that application.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1968: 11972: 21973: 11975: 11976: 11977: 11982: 11985: 119682026peak 1972 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list