TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Anderson v. Johnson

Anderson v. Johnson, Warden

Anderson v. Johnson, 390 U.S. 456 (1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
March 25, 1968
Docket
No. 700
Judges
Marshall
Citations
390 U.S. 45688 S. Ct. 119420 L. Ed. 2d 271968 U.S. LEXIS 2121

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

Four members of the Court would reverse. Four members of the Court would dismiss the writ as improvidently granted. Consequently, the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit remains in effect.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

1968: 11969: 11971: 11972: 21979: 11986: 119682026peak 1972 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list