TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Clark Walter & Sons, Inc. v. United States

CLARK WALTER & SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES Et Al.

Clark Walter & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 392 U.S. 659 (1968)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
June 17, 1968
Docket
No. 1404
Judges
Black, Fortas
Citations
392 U.S. 65988 S. Ct. 228620 L. Ed. 2d 13481968 U.S. LEXIS 30991968 Trade Cas. (CCH) 72,491
Cited by 12

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Fortas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 12 cases

View all citing references →
1969: 11970: 41971: 11976: 21977: 11982: 21983: 119692026peak 1970 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.552 F. Supp. 131 (D.D.C. 1983)
  2. United States v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.534 F.2d 113 (8th Cir. 1976)
  3. United States v. Automobile Manufacturers Ass'n307 F. Supp. 617 (C.D. Cal. 1970)
  4. May Department Stores Co. v. First Hartford Corp.435 F. Supp. 849 (D. Conn. 1977)
  5. United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.333 F. Supp. 1100 (S.D.N.Y. 1971)
  6. United States v. Ciba Corp.50 F.R.D. 507 (S.D.N.Y. 1970)

Most recent

  1. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.552 F. Supp. 131 (D.D.C. 1983)
  2. United States v. American Cyanamid Co.556 F. Supp. 357 (S.D.N.Y. 1982)
  3. Golden v. National Finance Adjusters555 F. Supp. 42 (E.D. Mich. 1982)
  4. May Department Stores Co. v. First Hartford Corp.435 F. Supp. 849 (D. Conn. 1977)
  5. United States v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc. v534 F.2d 113 (8th Cir. 1976)
  6. United States v. Associated Milk Producers, Inc.534 F.2d 113 (8th Cir. 1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list