TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Stamler v. Willis

STAMLER Et Al. v. WILLIS Et Al.

Stamler v. Willis, 393 U.S. 217 (1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
January 13, 1969
Docket
No. 478
Judges
Marshall
Citations
393 U.S. 217

Opinion — Per Curiam

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeals are dismissed.

Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Harlan are of the opinion that further consideration of the question of jurisdiction should be postponed to the hearing of the cases on the merits and that the cases should be set for oral argument.

Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1969: 319692026peak 1969 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Powell v. McCormack395 U.S. 486 (1969)
  2. Jeremiah Stamler, M.D. And Yolanda F. Hall, and Milton M. Cohen, Intervening v. Hon. Edwin E. Willis415 F.2d 1365 (7th Cir. 1969)
  3. Rosa v. Gil309 F. Supp. 1332 (D.P.R. 1969)

Most recent

  1. Powell v. McCormack395 U.S. 486 (1969)
  2. Rosa v. Gil309 F. Supp. 1332 (D.P.R. 1969)
  3. Jeremiah Stamler, M.D. And Yolanda F. Hall, and Milton M. Cohen, Intervening v. Hon. Edwin E. Willis415 F.2d 1365 (7th Cir. 1969)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list