Brotherhood of Railroad Trainment v. John P. O'connell, Etc.
Opinion
395 U.S. 210 89 S.Ct. 1767 23 L.Ed.2d 213
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMENT et al. v. John P. O'CONNELL, etc., et al.
No. 158.
Elmer L. DIRKS, Individually and as General Chairman
of the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, et al.,
v.
W. L. BIRKHOLZ et al.
No. 172.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 26, 1969
Arnold B. Elkind, New York City, for petitioners in No. 158.
David L. Uelmen, Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioners in No. 172.
Lee Leibik, Chicago, Ill., for respondents.
On Writs of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second and Seventh Circuits.
PER CURIAM.
1
The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the respective district courts with instructions to dismiss the cases as moot.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Douglas T. Wightman v. Springfield Terminal Railway Company and United Transportation Union
- Dempsey v. Atchison, Topeka And Santa Fe Railway Company
- Dempsey v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
- Howell v. Town of Fairfield
- Elizabeth Forsling Harris v. Gloria Steinem, Patricia Carbine and Ms. Magazine Corp.
- Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross
Most recent
- Douglas T. Wightman v. Springfield Terminal Railway Company and United Transportation Union
- Dempsey v. Atchison, Topeka And Santa Fe Railway Company
- Dempsey v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
- Howell v. Town of Fairfield
- Elizabeth Forsling Harris v. Gloria Steinem, Patricia Carbine and Ms. Magazine Corp.
- Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.