TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Boston & Maine R. Co. v. United States

Boston & Me. R. Co. v. United States, 396 U.S. 27 (1969)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
October 14, 1969
Docket
No. 343
Judges
Per Curiam
Citations
396 U.S. 2790 S. Ct. 19624 L. Ed. 2d 1421969 U.S. LEXIS 447

Opinion — Per Curiam

396 U.S. 27 (1969)

BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.

No. 343.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 10, 1969. [*] APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS.

Carl E. Newton and M. Lauck Walton for appellants in No. 343. Lee Johnson, Attorney General of Oregon, Richard W. Sabin, Assistant Attorney General, and Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General of Nebraska, for appellants in No. 480. Howard J. Trienens, Martin M. Lucente, George L. Saunders, Jr., R. Ames, W. W. Dalton, K. A. Dobbins, J. H. Durkin, N. Melvin, T. A. Miller, A. B. Russ, Jr., R. D. Sickler, E. L. Van Dellen, R. W. Yost, and S. R. Brittingham, Jr., for appellants in No. 497.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, Fritz R. Kahn, and Jerome Nelson for the United States et al. in all cases. Hugh B. Cox and William H. Allen for railroad appellees in all cases.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.

NOTES

[*] Together with No. 480, Arizona Corporation Commission et al. v. United States et al., and No. 497, Union Pacific Railroad Co. et al. v. United States et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 17 cases

View all citing references →
1970: 11971: 11973: 21976: 11977: 11978: 41979: 31980: 419702026peak 1978 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company v. Long Island Rail Road Company595 F.2d 96 (2d Cir. 1979)
  2. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. Long Island Rail Road447 F. Supp. 108 (E.D.N.Y. 1978)
  3. Pacific Fruit Express Co. v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad355 F. Supp. 700 (N.D. Cal. 1973)
  4. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. United States619 F.2d 988 (3d Cir. 1980)
  5. In re Boston & Maine Corp.456 F. Supp. 412 (D. Mass. 1978)
  6. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Chicago and North Western Transportation Company William M. Gibbons, Trusteeof the Property of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad, as Trustee, Andnot Individually, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Burlingtonnortherninc., Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroadcompany, Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Union Pacific Railroadcompany, Western Pacific Railroad Company, Soo Line Railroad Company . The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Burlington Northern Inc., Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company, Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company,western Pacificrailroad Company v. The United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Chicago and North Western Transportation Company, Soo Line Railroad Company, Stanley E. G. Hillman, Trustee of the Property of the Chicago, Milwaukee, st.paul and Pacific Railroad Company, Debtor ("Milwaukee Railroad") . Consolidated Rail Corporation, Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Companyand Soo Line Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Burlington Northern Inc.,missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company,southern Pacific Transportation Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Andwesternpacific Railroad Company619 F.2d 988 (3d Cir. 1980)

Most recent

  1. In re Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Appeal of Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, in Re Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Appeal of Maine Central Railroad Company, in Re Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Appeal of Penn Central Corporation, in Re Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Appeal of Canadian Pacific, in Re Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor, Appeal of Eastern Associated Coal Corporation634 F.2d 1359 (1st Cir. 1980)
  2. In re Boston & Maine Corp.634 F.2d 1359 (1st Cir. 1980)
  3. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Chicago and North Western Transportation Company William M. Gibbons, Trusteeof the Property of the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad, as Trustee, Andnot Individually, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Burlingtonnortherninc., Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroadcompany, Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Union Pacific Railroadcompany, Western Pacific Railroad Company, Soo Line Railroad Company . The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Burlington Northern Inc., Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company, Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company,western Pacificrailroad Company v. The United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Chicago and North Western Transportation Company, Soo Line Railroad Company, Stanley E. G. Hillman, Trustee of the Property of the Chicago, Milwaukee, st.paul and Pacific Railroad Company, Debtor ("Milwaukee Railroad") . Consolidated Rail Corporation, Chicago and Northwestern Transportation Companyand Soo Line Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Burlington Northern Inc.,missouri Pacific Railroad Company, Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad Company,southern Pacific Transportation Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Andwesternpacific Railroad Company619 F.2d 988 (3d Cir. 1980)
  4. Consolidated Rail Corp. v. United States619 F.2d 988 (3d Cir. 1980)
  5. In re Boston and Maine Corporation, Debtor (4 Cases). Appeal of Maine Central Railroad Company. Appeal of Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company Appeal of Trailer Train Company. Appeal of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company600 F.2d 307 (1st Cir. 1979)
  6. In re Boston & Maine Corp.600 F.2d 307 (1st Cir. 1979)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list