Tex Tan Welhausen Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
TEX TAN WELHAUSEN CO. Et Al. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Tex Tan Welhausen Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 397 U.S. 819 (1970)
Opinion
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of H. K. Porter Co.
v. National Labor Relations Board, ante, p. 99.
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents to the remand.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(denying all vacation benefits because employees were not at work on December 31 or were absent more than 280 hours, where plan called for percentage payment according to annual salary)
Cited by 12 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- National Labor Relations Board v. A. W. Thompson, Inc.
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jemco, Inc.
- Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
- Tex Tan Welhausen Company and Tex Tan Western Leather Company, Division of Tandy Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
- National Labor Relations Board v. Henriksen, Inc., D/B/A Gibson Discount Center
- National Labor Relations Board v. Scenic Sportswear
Most recent
- The Cincinnati Newspaper Guild, Local 9, the Newspaper Guild, Afl-Cio, Clc v. National Labor Relations Board
- Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
- No. 79-1735
- Kansas City Power & Light Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
- National Labor Relations Board v. Knuth Brothers, Inc.
- National Labor Relations Board v. Henriksen, Inc., D/B/A Gibson Discount Center
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.