Keyes v. School District No. 1
Wilfred Keyes v. School District Number One, Denver, Colorado
Opinion
Per Curiam.
The sole basis for the Tenth Circuit’s action in granting the stay of the District Court’s order in this case was the view “that it would be unfair to the School District to compel it to take further steps in the implementation of the total plan until [the Tenth Circuit] and the party litigants have the benefit of the United States Supreme Court decisions in the Swann and combined desegregation cases . . . .”
The decisions in those cases having now been announced, it is proper to vacate the stay and remit the matter to the Court of Appeals freed of its earlier speculation as to the bearing of our decision in Swann and related cases.
We, of course, intimate no views upon the merits of the underlying issues.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(declining to apply principle under the circumstances)
Cited by 10 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Supreme Court1
- U.S. Courts of Appeals3
- Federal District Courts3
- Federal Specialty Courts1
- State Highest Courts1
- State Appellate Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Keyes v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1, DENVER, COLO.
- Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, Denver
- Shawnee Coal Company v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior
- First National Bank in Albuquerque, as Guardian for and on Behalf of Dorothy Jean Huckleby v. United States
- State v. Bontempo
- Holiday Spas v. Montgomery County Human Relations Commission
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.