Pease v. Hansen
PEASE v. HANSEN, DIRECTOR, CASCADE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, Et Al.
Opinion
Per Curiam.
The motion of the appellant for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.
Whether a welfare program is or is not federally funded is irrelevant to the constitutional principles enunciated in Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U. S. 618 . The judgment of the Supreme Court of Montana is reversed.
The Chief Justice is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.